**Abstract.** Alan M. Turing made certain significant contributions to computer science.
However, their importance and impact is often greatly exaggerated, at the expense of the field's pioneers.
It's not Turing's fault, though.

Partially redundant companion articles of 2021: **(1)** 90th anniversary celebrations—1931: Kurt Gödel, founder of theoretical computer science,
shows limits of math, logic, computing, and artificial intelligence.^{[GOD21,a,b]} **(2)**
80th anniversary celebrations—1941: Konrad Zuse completes the first working general-purpose computer, based on his 1936 patent application.^{[ZUS21,a,b]}
**(3)**
375th birthday of Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, founder of computer science.^{[LEI21,a,b]}
##

TL;DR: Executive Summary (added in 2022)

Some have suggested that Turing founded computer science or at least artificial intelligence (AI),^{[BEA]} invented the computer,^{[IMI][HAI14]} showed the undecidability of the halting problem,^{[HLT21]} single-handedly created the method that broke the Nazi code in WWII,^{[IMI][NASC6-7]} or invented the "Turing test."^{[TUR3a]}
None of
these claims is compatible with the historical facts, and Turing himself did not claim any of this during his life.
Computer science dates back at least to Leibniz (1600s), the so-called "first computer scientist,"^{[LA14]} who built on even earlier work since the first programmable machine by
Heron of Alexandria in the 1st century B.C.[SHA7a][RAU1] Leibniz described the first machine to perform all four arithmetic operations,
the first with a memory,^{[BL16]}
and principles of binary computers (1679)^{[L79][LA14][HO66][L03][LEI21,a,b]}
employed by virtually all modern machines; his formal *Algebra of Thought* (1686)^{[L86][WI48][LEI21,a,b]} is
deductively equivalent^{[LE18]} to the
*Boolean Algebra* (1847).^{[BOO]}

The first 20th century pioneer of *practical* AI was not Turing but
Quevedo:
his 1914 chess end game player was still considered remarkable decades later at the 1951 Paris AI conference.^{[BRU1-4][BRO21]}

The *theory* of AI and computer science was not founded by Turing but by Gödel (1931-34),^{[GOD][GOD34]}
who identified the fundamental limits of algorithmic theorem proving, computing, and any type of computation-based AI,^{[GOD][BIB3]} as well as computer science's most famous open problem "P=NP?"^{[GOD56][URQ10]}
(there is a reason why there is a *Gödel Prize* for theoretical computer science).
Gödel's 1931 work was extended by Church, whose 1935 result^{[CHU]} on the decision problem preceded Turing's identical 1936 result.^{[TUR]}

Turing's 1936 paper^{[TUR]} was claimed to provide the "theoretical backbone" for all computers to come.^{[NASC7]}
However, it just described a simple
theoretical and impractical pen & paper construct like
those of Gödel (1931-34),^{[GOD][GOD34]} Church (1935),^{[CHU]} and Post (1936),^{[POS]} which did not even feature *elementary* practical building blocks such as addressable memory.
It was actually
Zuse's 1936 patent application^{[ZU36]} which really described what became the first
practical general-purpose program-controlled computer (completed in 1941).^{[ZUS21,a,b][RO98]}

Unlike Church (1935),^{[CHU]} Turing (1936) did not even consider *halting* programs;^{[TUR]}
the famous *halting problem* (often attributed to him) was actually named by Davis in 1958^{[HLT58]} and formulated by Kleene in 1952.^{[HLT52][HLT21]}

The Colossus *special purpose* computer of WWII^{[NASC6-7]} was designed by Flowers, not by Turing. The core of the Enigma code-breaking algorithm was not due to Turing either (as sometimes suggested^{[IMI]}) but to Polish mathematicians Rejewski, Rozycki and Zygalski.

The famous so-called "Turing Test" was actually predefined by Descartes.^{[TUR3,a,b]}

On the other hand, Turing did publish pioneering work, e.g., in bioinformatics.^{[TUR2]}
It seems unlikely that the great scientist he was would ever approve of the overblown claims about him so easily dismissing the work of his colleagues.

##

Full Text

We need to stop overselling the contributions of individual scientists at the cost of their peers.
Instead let's heed the recent call in the journal *Nature*: Let us
"value those who ensure that
science is self-correcting."^{[SV20]}
As those who know me can testify, finding and citing original sources of scientific and technological innovations is important to me.^{[NASC1-9][HIN][T22]} The present article is offered as a resource for those who share this inclination.

Here I will focus on foundational concepts of computer science,
sometimes erroneously attributed to the British mathematician
Alan M. Turing, especially in the Anglosphere.
He did make certain very significant contributions to the field.
But they have been greatly inflated by various sources,
as I shall outline below.^{[VAR13][HAI14][NASC4-7][T22]}

For example,
it was claimed that Turing *founded* computer science.^{[BEA]}
He didn't.^{[HAI14][NASC4-5][GOD21][ZUS21,a,b][LEI21,a,b]}
The peer-reviewed British journal Nature published overblown claims such as:
*Turing's 1936 paper provided the "theoretical backbone" for all computers to come*.^{[NASC7]} It didn't.
A popular British movie^{[IMI]} even went so far as to say
he *invented* the computer (see also^{[COP11]}).
He didn't.^{[VAR13][HAI14][ZUS21,a,b]}
A prominent historian wrote:^{[HAI14]}
"I could fill many columns doing nothing more than skewering ridiculous things written about Turing, many of them by people who ought to know better."

A good entry point to this discussion is
ACM's official justification^{[T19]} of the
2018 A.M. Turing Award which says:
"The ACM A.M. Turing Award, often referred to as the "Nobel Prize of Computing," carries a $1 million prize, with financial support provided by Google, Inc. It is named for Alan M. Turing, the British mathematician who articulated the mathematical foundation and limits of computing."

Although ACM's statement on Turing is not plain wrong, it is greatly misleading, like some of its other statements.^{[T22]}
ACM correctly states that Turing "articulated the mathematical foundation and limits of computing." However, many
have done this over the decades, and when it comes to credit assignment in science,
the important question is: **Who did it first? It wasn't Turing.**

Turing published five years after the groundbreaking work of
the Austrian mathematician Kurt Gödel (**1931**)^{[GOD][GOD21,a,b]} and one year after the American Alonzo Church (**1935**),^{[CHU]} Turing's advisor. Of course, he cited both of them in his **1936** paper^{[TUR]} (whose corrections appeared in **1937**).
With that in mind, let us look more closely at the birth of modern computer science.

In the early 1930s, Gödel became the founder of modern theoretical computer science.^{[GOD][GOD34]} He introduced a *universal coding language* (**1931-34**)^{[GOD][GOD34][GOD21,a,b]}
based on the integers. It allows for formalizing the operations of any digital computer in axiomatic form.
Gödel used it to represent both data (such as axioms and theorems) and programs^{[VAR13]} (such as proof-generating sequences of operations on the data).
He famously constructed formal statements that talk about the computation of other formal statements—especially self-referential statements which imply that they are not decidable, given a computational theorem prover that systematically enumerates all possible theorems from an enumerable set of axioms. Thus he identified fundamental limits of algorithmic theorem proving, computing, and
any type of computation-based AI.^{[GOD][BIB3][MIR](Sec. 18)[T22](Sec. IV)}
Much of early AI in the **1940s-70s** was actually about theorem proving^{[ZU48][NS56]}
and deduction in Gödel style through expert systems and logic programming.

Gödel built on earlier work by
Gottlob Frege^{[FRE]} (who introduced the first formal language, **1879**),
Georg Cantor^{[CAN]} (diagonalization trick, **1891**),
Thoralf Skolem^{[SKO23]} (who introduced primitive recursive functions, **1923**) and Jacques Herbrand^{[GOD86]} (who identified
limitations of Skolem's approach).
These authors in turn built on
the formal *Algebra of Thought* (**1686**) by
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz^{[L86][WI48][LEI21,a,b]} which is
deductively equivalent^{[LE18]} to the later
*Boolean Algebra* of **1847**.^{[BOO]}
Leibniz, one of the candidates for the title of "father of computer science,"
has been called "the world's first computer scientist"^{[LA14]}
and even "the smartest man who ever lived."^{[SMO13]}
He was not only the first to publish infinitesimal
calculus (**1684**),^{[L84]}
but also the first to describe principles of binary computers (**1679**) governed by punch cards.^{[L79][L03][LA14][HO66]}
(Binary number encodings *per se* are much older than that,
dating back to ancient Egypt.
The *algorithmic* part on binary arithmetic operations is relatively new though.
Compare Juan Caramuel y Lobkowitz' publication on binary encodings
(1670) and Thomas Harriott's unpublished papers.^{[IN08][SH51]})
Moreover, Leibniz
pursued an ambitious and highly influential project to answer
*all* possible questions through computation, with the help of
a universal language and a general calculus for reasoning: the *Characteristica Universalis & Calculus Ratiocinator*^{[WI48][LE18]} (inspired by the
**13th century** scholar Ramon Llull^{[LL7]}).
In the **early 1930s**, however, Gödel's famous result
showed the limitations
of Leibniz' project.^{[GOD21]}

In **1935,** Church derived a corollary / extension of Gödel's result by demonstrating that Hilbert & Ackermann's *Entscheidungsproblem* (decision problem) does not have a general solution.^{[CHU]} To do this, he used his alternative universal coding language called *Untyped Lambda Calculus*, which forms the basis of the
highly influential programming language LISP.

In **1936,** Turing
introduced yet another universal model which has become perhaps
the most well-known of them all (at least in computer science): the
*Turing Machine*.^{[TUR]} He rederived the above-mentioned result.^{[CHU][TUR][HIN]}
Of course, he cited both Gödel and Church in his 1936 paper^{[TUR]} (whose corrections appeared in **1937**).
In the same year of **1936**, Emil Post published yet another independent universal model of computing,^{[POS]}
also citing Gödel and Church.
Today we know many such models. Church proved that his model had the same expressive power as Gödel's.
Nevertheless,
according to Wang,^{[WA74-96]} it was Turing's work (1936) that convinced Gödel
of the universality of both his own approach (1931-34) and Church's (1935).
Interestingly, Church's notion of computation already included termination, Turing's did not—see also the famous *halting problem* named by Davis in 1958^{[HLT58]} and formulated by Kleene in **1952**.^{[HLT52][HLT21]}

Like Gödel's original universal language of **1931-34**,
the Turing Machine and the Post Machine of **1936** are *theoretical* and *impractical*
constructs that cannot directly serve as a foundation for
real-world computers.
Remarkably, Konrad Zuse's patent application^{[ZU36]} for the
first practical general program-controlled computer
also dates
back to **1936** (see below).

What exactly did Turing^{[TUR]} and Post^{[POS]} do in 1936 that
hadn't been done earlier by Gödel^{[GOD][GOD34]} (1931-34) and Church^{[CHU]} (1935)?
There is a seemingly minor difference whose
significance emerged only later.
Many of Gödel's
instruction sequences were series of multiplications of number-coded storage contents by integers.
Gödel did not care that the computational complexity of such multiplications tends to increase with storage size.
Similarly, Church also ignored the context-dependent spatio-temporal complexity of the basic
instructions in his algorithms.
Turing and Post, however, adopted
a traditional, reductionist, minimalist, binary view of
computing. Their machine models
permitted only very simple elementary binary instructions with *constant* complexity, like
the early binary machine model of Leibniz (1679)^{[L79][LA14][HO66]} and Zuse's 1936 patent application.^{[ZU36]}
They did not exploit this—Turing used his
(quite inefficient) model only
to rephrase the results of Gödel and Church on the limits of computability.
Later, however, the simplicity of these machines made them a convenient tool for
theoretical studies of complexity.
(I also happily used and generalized them for the case
of never-ending computations.^{[ALL2]})

Some sources claim that Turing at
least laid the foundations of *Artificial Intelligence*.^{[BEA]}
Does this make any sense?
In **1948**, Turing wrote up
ideas related to
artificial evolution^{[TUR1]} and
learning
artificial recurrent neural networks,
whose architectures date back to the work of Lenz and Ising in the **1920s**.^{[L20][I25][K41][MC43][W45][K56][AMH1][AMH2]}
Turing did not publish though, which
explains his paper's lack of impact.
In **1950**, he proposed a simple but famous subjective
test for evaluating whether a computer is intelligent.^{[IMI]}
This "Turing Test," however, was prefigured by Descartes, whom Turing was apparently aware of.^{[TUR3,a,b]}
In **1956**, at a conference in Dartmouth,
the expression "AI" was coined by John McCarthy
as a new label for related research.
The first conference on AI, however,
had taken place already in **1951** in Paris,^{[AI51][BRU4][BRO21]}
when much of what's now called
AI was still called *Cybernetics,*
with a focus
very much in line with
modern AI
based on deep neural networks.^{[DL1-2][DEC]}

Even long before that, in **1914,** the Spaniard Leonardo Torres y Quevedo had become
the 20th century's first pioneer of practical AI
when he built
the first working chess end game player
(back then chess was considered as an activity restricted to the realms of intelligent creatures).
The machine was still considered impressive decades later when
the AI pioneer Norbert Wiener played against
it at the **1951** Paris conference.^{[AI51][BRU1-4][BRO21]}

Konrad Zuse, however, had more general chess routines already in
**1945**.^{[KNU]} (He also applied his pioneering *Plankalkül* programming language
to theorem proving
in **1948**,^{[ZU48]} long before Newell & Simon's work of **1956**.^{[NS56]})
As mentioned above,
the pioneer of modern *AI Theory* was Gödel himself (**1931-34**), who identified
the limits of AI & math & computing, and laid formal foundations
of AI based on automatic theorem proving and deduction through expert systems (some erroneously
thought he also showed that humans are superior to AIs^{[BIB3]}).
In sum, the foundational achievements in AI greatly predate Turing's.

The *Gödel Prize* for theoretical computer science is named after Gödel.
The currently more lucrative *ACM A. M. Turing Award* was created in 1966 for
contributions "of lasting and major technical importance to the computer field."
It is funny—and at the same time embarrassing—that Gödel (1906-1978) never got one, although he not only laid the foundations of the "modern" version of the field, but also identified its most famous open problem "P=NP?" in his famous letter to John von Neumann (**1956**).^{[GOD56][URQ10]}
Neither did Church (1903-1995). There would have been plenty of time though—these pioneers died years after the award was introduced.

Likewise, Konrad Zuse (1910-1995)
never got a Turing award despite having
created the world's first working programmable general computer 1935-41.
His above-mentioned patent application of **1936**^{[ZU36-38][Z36][RO98][ZUS21,a,b]}
described the digital circuits required by programmable physical hardware,
predating Claude Shannon's **1937** thesis on digital circuit design.^{[SHA37]}
Zuse also created the first high-level programming language in the **early 1940s**.^{[BAU][KNU]}
Zuse's Z3 computer of **1941** was a working *practical* device, not just a
*theoretical and impractical pen & paper construct* like
those of Gödel (1931-34), Church (1935), Turing (1936), and Post (1936), which did not even feature elementary practical building blocks such as addressable memory.
Ignoring the inevitable storage limitations of any physical computer,
the physical hardware of Z3 was indeed
*universal* in the modern sense of the
theory papers above—simple arithmetic tricks
can compensate for its lack of an explicit
conditional jump instruction of the type "IF ... THEN GOTO ADDRESS ..."^{[RO98]}
(BTW, it is much more awkward to program Turing or Post machines which also do not allow for "modern" conditional jumps—they do not even have
numbered memory addresses to which an instruction pointer could jump).
Where does Z3 fit in the history of computing hardware?

The first known gear-based computational device was the
Antikythera mechanism (a kind of astronomical clock) in Ancient Greece over 2000 years ago.
1.5 millennia later, Peter Henlein still made conceptually similar machines—albeit smaller—namely, the first miniaturized pocket watches (1505).
But these devices always calculated the same thing, e.g., divide minutes by 60 to get hours.
The **1600s** brought more flexible machines that computed answers in response to *input data*.
The first data-processing gear-based special purpose calculator for simple arithmetics was built in **1623** by
Wilhelm Schickard,
one of the candidates for the title of
"father of automatic computing," followed by the
superior Pascaline of Blaise Pascal (**1642**).

In **1673**, the aforementioned inevitable
Leibniz
designed the first machine (the step reckoner) that could perform all four arithmetic operations,
and the first with a memory.^{[BL16]}
He also described principles of binary computers (**1679**)^{[L79][LA14][HO66][L03][LEI21,a,b]}
employed by virtually all modern computers including Zuse's Z3.

Z3 used
*electromagnetic* relays with visibly moving switches.
The first *electronic* special purpose calculator
(whose moving parts were electrons too small to see)
was the
binary ABC (US, 1942) by
John Atanasoff (the "father of tube-based computing"^{[NASC6a]}).
Unlike the gear-based machines of the **1600s**,
ABC used tubes—today's machines use the
transistor principle
patented by
Julius E. Lilienfeld
in **1925**.^{[LIL1-2]}
But unlike Z3, ABC was not freely programmable.
Neither was the *electronic*
Colossus machine by Tommy Flowers (UK, 1943-45)
used to break the Nazi code^{[NASC6]} (see below).

On the other hand,
the concept of *programs* was well-known by then.
Perhaps the world's first programmable machine was an automatic theatre made in the **1st
century**^{}[SHA7a][RAU1] by Heron of Alexandria
(who apparently also had the first known working steam engine—the *Aeolipile*).
The energy source of his programmable
automaton was a falling weight pulling a string wrapped around pins of a revolving cylinder.
Complex instruction sequences controlling doors and puppets
for several minutes were encoded by complex wrappings.
The **9th century**
music automaton by the Banu Musa brothers in Baghdad^{[BAN][KOE1]} used pins on
a revolving cylinder to store programs controlling a steam-driven
flute—compare Al-Jazari's programmable drum machine of **1206**.^{[SHA7b]}
The first *commercial* program-controlled
machines (punch card-based looms) were built in France around
**1800** by Joseph-Marie Jacquard and others—perhaps the first "modern"
programmers who wrote the world's first industrial software.

In this context it seems worth pointing out the difference between
*programs* and the more limited user-given input data of the **1600s** mentioned above.
Programs are instruction sequences stored on some medium, e.g., on punch cards,
and can be run again and again, without human intervention.
Over time the physical objects required to store programs have become lighter.
Ancient machines stored
them on rotating cylinders;
Jacquard stored them on cardboard;
Zuse stored them on 35mm film,
today we often store them using electrons and magnetizable material.

Jacquard's programs (around
**1800**) were not yet of the general purpose kind.
They inspired Ada Lovelace and her mentor
Charles Babbage (UK, circa **1840**). He planned but was unable to build a
programmable, general purpose computer (only his *non-universal special purpose calculator*
led to a working 20th century replica).
Unlike Babbage, Zuse (**1936-41**) used Leibniz'
principles of *binary computation* (**1679**)^{[L79][LA14][HO66][L03][LEI21,a,b]}
instead of traditional
*decimal computation*.
This greatly simplified the hardware.
The first general working programmable machine built by
someone other than Zuse was Howard Aiken's still *decimal* MARK I (US, **1944**).
The much faster *decimal* ENIAC by Eckert and Mauchly
(**1945/46**) could be programmed by rewiring it.
Today, however, most computers are *binary* like Z3.

Both data *and* programs were stored in electronic memory
by the "Manchester baby" (Williams, Kilburn & Tootill, UK, **1948**)^{[COP15]}
and the **1948** upgrade of ENIAC, which was reprogrammed by entering numerical instruction codes into read-only memory.^{[HAI14b]}
Already in **1936-38**, however, Zuse may have been the first to suggest to put both program instructions and data into memory.^{[ZU36-38]}
It was pointed out that
none of the computers built during the 1940s
were influenced in any way by Turing's 1936 theoretical paper,
except perhaps his own ACE design.^{[HAI14]}

We note once more
that Gödel's formal model of **1931-34**^{[GOD][GOD34]}
also encoded/stored data (e.g., axioms) and
programs (sequences of operations on the data) and results (e.g., theorems) in the same
integer-based storage (now known as Gödel numbering), just like Turing and Post later stored them in bit strings.
Of course, the behavior
of any Turing machine or Post machine or any other digital computer
can be formalized in Gödel's original universal model
(this inspired my self-referential Gödel Machine^{[GM6]}).
It should be noted, however, that we are using *modern terminology* here: Neither Gödel
(1931) nor Church (1935) nor Turing (1936)
mentioned the term *"program"* in their papers
(albeit
Zuse's 1936 patent application frequently referred to a
*"Rechenplan"*^{[ZU36]} which means *"program"*).
Similarly, the term *"stored program"* first appeared
later in the context of electronic storage.^{[HAI14b]}

Turing published pioneering work in bioinformatics.^{[TUR2]}
However, his
greatest impact came probably through his contribution to cracking the Enigma code,^{[NASC7]} used by the German military during the Second World War. He worked with Gordon Welchman at Bletchley Park in the UK. The famous code-breaking Colossus machine,^{[NASC6]} however, was designed by Tommy Flowers (not by Turing). The
British cryptographers built
on earlier foundational work by Polish mathematicians Marian Rejewski, Jerzy Rozycki and Henryk Zygalski who were the first to break the Enigma code (none of them were even mentioned in the movie^{[IMI]}). Some say this was decisive for defeating the Third Reich.^{[NASC7]}

To summarise, many have contributed to the theory and practice of computing.
Nevertheless, Turing's contributions were significant,
although he was standing on the shoulders of giants.^{[GOD][GOD34-21a][CHU][HAI14][VAR13][BRU1-4][NASC4-7][LEI21,a,b][ZUS21,a,b]}
His famous 1936 paper diligently cites the pioneering work of Gödel (1931) and Church (1935).
It seems unlikely that the great scientist he was would ever approve of the overblown claims about him so easily dismissing the work of his colleagues.

##

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Jack Copeland for inviting me in May 2020 to write a piece about Alan Turing. Thanks to Moshe Vardi, Herbert Bruderer, Jack Copeland, Wolfgang Bibel, Teun Koetsier, Scott Aaronson, Dylan Ashley, Sebastian Oberhoff, Kai Hormann, Cris Calude, and several other expert reviewers for useful comments on the contents of the four companion articles.^{[LEI21,a,b][GOD21,a,b][ZUS21,a,b][TUR21]} Since science is about self-correction, let me know under *juergen@idsia.ch* if you can spot any remaining error. The contents of this article may be used for educational and non-commercial purposes, including articles for Wikipedia and similar sites.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

##

References

[ALL2]
J. Schmidhuber (2000).
Algorithmic theories of everything.
ArXiv:
quant-ph/ 0011122.
More.
See also:
Hierarchies of generalized Kolmogorov complexities and nonenumerable universal measures computable in the limit.
International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science 13(4):587-612, 2002.
PDF.
More.
See also:
The Speed Prior: A New Simplicity Measure Yielding Near-Optimal Computable Predictions.
Proc. COLT 2002.
PDF. More.

[AI51]
Les Machines a Calculer et la Pensee Humaine: Paris, 8.-13. Januar 1951, Colloques internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; no. 37, Paris 1953.
[*H. Bruderer rightly calls that the first conference on AI.*]

[AMH1]
S. I. Amari (1972).
Learning patterns and pattern sequences by self-organizing nets of threshold elements. IEEE Transactions, C 21, 1197-1206, 1972.
PDF.
*First publication of what was later sometimes called the Hopfield network*^{[AMH2]} or Amari-Hopfield Network,^{[AMH3]} based on the Lenz-Ising recurrent architecture.^{[L20][I25][T22]}

[AMH2]
J. J. Hopfield (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent
collective computational abilities. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences,
vol. 79, pages 2554-2558, 1982.
*The Hopfield network or Amari-Hopfield Network was first published in 1972 by Amari.*^{[AMH1]} [AMH2] did not cite [AMH1].

[AMH3]
Ana P. Millan, Joaquin J. Torres, Joaquin Marro.
How Memory Conforms to Brain Development.
Front. Comput. Neuroscience, 2019

[BAN]
Banu Musa brothers (9th century). The book of ingenious devices (Kitab al-hiyal). Translated by D. R. Hill (1979), Springer, p. 44, ISBN 90-277-0833-9.
*[Perhaps the Banu Musa music automaton was the world's first machine with a stored program.]*

[BAU]
F. L. Bauer, H. Woessner (1972). The "Plankalkül" of Konrad Zuse: A Forerunner of Today's Programming Languages.

[BEA]
A. Beavers (2013). Alan Turing: Mathematical Mechanist. In S. B. Cooper, J. van Leeuwen (eds.). Alan Turing: His Work and Impact. Waltham: Elsevier. pp. 481-485.

[BIB3]
W. Bibel (2003).
Mosaiksteine einer Wissenschaft vom Geiste. Invited talk at
the conference on AI and Gödel, Arnoldsheim, 4-6 April 2003.
Manuscript, 2003.

[BL16]
L. Bloch (2016). Informatics in the light of some Leibniz's works.
Communication to XB2 Berlin Xenobiology Conference.

[BOO]
George Boole (1847). The Mathematical Analysis of Logic, Being an Essay towards a Calculus of Deductive Reasoning.
London, England: Macmillan, Barclay, & Macmillan, 1847.

[BRO21]
D. C. Brock (2021).
Cybernetics, Computer Design, and a Meeting of the Minds.
An influential 1951 conference in Paris considered the computer as a model of—and for—the human mind.
IEEE Spectrum, 2021.
Link.

[BRU1]
H. Bruderer. Computing history beyond the UK and US: selected landmarks from continental Europe. Communications of the ACM 60.2 (2017): 76-84.

[BRU2]
H. Bruderer. Meilensteine der Rechentechnik. 2 volumes, 3rd edition. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2020.

[BRU3]
H. Bruderer. Milestones in Analog and Digital Computing. 2 volumes, 3rd edition. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2020.

[BRU4]
H. Bruderer. The Birthplace of Artificial Intelligence? Communications of the ACM, BLOG@CACM, Nov 2017.
Link.

[CAN]
G. Cantor (1891). Ueber eine elementare Frage der Mannigfaltigkeitslehre. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung, 1:75-78. *[English translation: W. B. Ewald (ed.). From Immanuel Kant to David Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics, Volume 2, pp. 920-922. Oxford University Press, 1996.]*

[CHU]
A. Church (1935). An unsolvable problem of elementary number theory. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 41: 332-333. Abstract of a talk given on 19 April 1935, to the American Mathematical Society.
Also in American Journal of Mathematics, 58(2), 345-363 (1 Apr 1936).
*[First explicit proof that the Entscheidungsproblem (decision problem) does not have a general solution.]*

[COP11]
B. J. Copeland, D. Proudfoot. "Alan Turing: father of the modern computer." Rutherford Journal 4, 2011-2012.

[COP15]
B. J. Copeland, G. Sommaruga.
The Stored-Program Universal Computer: Did
Zuse Anticipate Turing and von Neumann?
In G. Sommaruga, T. Strahm (eds.), Turing's Revolution, Springer, 2015.

[DEC] J. Schmidhuber (AI Blog, 2020). The 2010s: Our Decade of Deep Learning / Outlook on the 2020s.

[DL1] J. Schmidhuber, 2015.
Deep Learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks, 61, 85-117.
More.

[DL2] J. Schmidhuber, 2015.
Deep Learning.
Scholarpedia, 10(11):32832.

[FRE] G. Frege (1879).
Begriffsschrift: eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle an der Saale: Verlag Louis Nebert.
*[The first formal language / formal proofs—basis of modern logic and programming languages.]*

[GM6]
J. Schmidhuber (2006).
Gödel machines:
Fully Self-Referential Optimal Universal Self-Improvers.
In B. Goertzel and C. Pennachin, eds.: * Artificial
General Intelligence,* p. 199-226, 2006.
PDF.
Preprint
arXiv:cs/0309048 (2003).
See also:
Ultimate Cognition * à la* Gödel.
*Cognitive Computation* 1(2):177-193, 2009. PDF.
More.

[GOD]
K. Gödel. Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 38:173-198, 1931.

[GOD34]
K. Gödel (1934).
On undecidable propositions of formal mathematical
systems. Notes by S. C. Kleene and J. B. Rosser on lectures
at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey, 1934, 30
pp. *(Reprinted in M. Davis, (ed.), The Undecidable. Basic Papers on Undecidable
Propositions, Unsolvable Problems, and Computable Functions,
Raven Press, Hewlett, New York, 1965.)*

[GOD56]
R. J. Lipton and K. W. Regan.
Gödel's lost letter and P=NP.
Link.

[GOD86]
K. Gödel.
Collected works Volume I: Publications 1929-36,
S. Feferman et. al., editors, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1986.

[GOD21] J. Schmidhuber (AI Blog, 2021). 90th anniversary celebrations: 1931: Kurt Gödel, founder of theoretical computer science, shows limits of math, logic, computing, and artificial intelligence. *This was number 1 on Hacker News.*

[GOD21a]
J. Schmidhuber (2021). Als Kurt Gödel die Grenzen des Berechenbaren entdeckte.
(When Kurt Gödel discovered the limits of computability.)
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 16/6/2021.

[GOD21b]
J. Schmidhuber (AI Blog, 2021). 80. Jahrestag: 1931: Kurt Gödel, Vater der theoretischen Informatik, entdeckt die Grenzen des Berechenbaren und der künstlichen Intelligenz.

[HAI14]
T. Haigh (2014). Historical reflections.
Actually, Turing did not invent the computer.
Communications of the ACM, Vol. 57(1): 36-41, Jan 2014.
PDF.

[HAI14b]
T. Haigh, M. Priestley, C. Rope (2014).
Reconsidering the Stored-Program Concept.
IEEE Annals of the History of Computing. IEEE, 2014.
PDF.

[HIN] J. Schmidhuber (AI Blog, 2020). Critique of 2019 Honda Prize.

[HLT52]
S. C. Kleene (1952). Introduction to metamathematics.

[HLT58]
M. Davis (1958). Computability and Unsolvability. McGraw-Hill, 1958.

[HLT21]
S. Lucas (2021). The origins of the halting problem. Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming, vol. 121, 2021.

[HO66]
E. Hochstetter et al. (1966): Herrn von Leibniz' Rechnung mit Null und Eins. Berlin: Siemens AG.

[I25]
E. Ising (1925). Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus. Z. Phys., 31 (1): 253-258, 1925. Based on [I24].
*
The first **non-learning* recurrent NN architecture (the Ising model or Lenz-Ising model) was introduced and analyzed by physicists Ernst Ising and Wilhelm Lenz in the 1920s.^{[L20][I25][K41][W45][T22]} It settles into an equilibrium state in response to input conditions, and is the foundation of the first published *learning* RNNs.^{[AMH1-2]}

[IN08]
R. Ineichen (2008). Leibniz, Caramuel, Harriot und das Dualsystem. Mitteilungen der deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 16(1):12-15.

[IMI]
The Imitation Game. Movie, U.K., 2014.

[K41]
H. A. Kramers and G. H. Wannier (1941). Statistics of the Two-Dimensional Ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. 60, 252 and 263, 1941.

[KNU]
D. E. Knuth, L. T. Pardo (1976). The Early Development of Programming Languages. Stanford University, Computer Science Department.
PDF.

[KOE1]
[21] T. Koetsier (2001). On the prehistory of programmable machines: musical automata, looms, calculators. Mechanism and Machine Theory, Elsevier, 36 (5): 589-603, 2001.

[L20]
W. Lenz (1920). Beitrag zum Verständnis der magnetischen
Erscheinungen in festen Körpern. Physikalische Zeitschrift, 21:613-615. See also [I25].

[L03]
G. Leibniz (1703). In: Explication de l'Arithmetique Binaire / Die Mathematischen Schriften, ed. C. Gerhardt, Berlin 1879, vol.7, p.223. English link.
*[Leibniz documented the binary arithmetics which allow for greatly simplifiying computing hardware and are employed by virtually all modern computers. Binary number encodings per se, however, seem to date back over 4000 years.]*

[L79]
G. Leibniz.
De Progressione dyadica Pars I. 15 March 1679.
*[Principles of binary computers governed by punch cards.]*

[L84]
G. Leibniz (1684).
Nova Methodus pro Maximis et Minimis.
*[First publication on infinitesimal calculus.]*

[L86]
G. Leibniz (1686). Generales Inquisitiones de analysi notionum et veritatum.
Also in
Leibniz: Die philosophischen Schriften VII, 1890, pp. 236-247; translated as "A Study in the Calculus of Real Addition" (1690) by G. H. R. Parkinson, Leibniz: Logical Papers—A Selection, Oxford 1966, pp. 131-144.

[LA14]
D. R. Lande (2014).
Development of the Binary Number System and the Foundations of Computer Science. The Mathematics Enthusiast, vol. 11(3):6 12, 2014.
Link.

[LE18]
W. Lenzen.
Leibniz and the Calculus Ratiocinator. Technology and Mathematics, pp 47-78, Springer, 2018.

[LEI21] J. Schmidhuber (AI Blog, 2021). 375th birthday of Leibniz, founder of computer science.

[LEI21a]
J. Schmidhuber (2021). Der erste Informatiker. Wie Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz den Computer erdachte.
(The first computer scientist. How Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz conceived the computer.)
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), 17/5/2021. FAZ online:
19/5/2021.

[LEI21b] J. Schmidhuber (AI Blog, 2021). 375. Geburtstag des Herrn Leibniz, dem Vater der Informatik.

[LIL1]
US Patent 1745175 by Austrian physicist Julius Edgar Lilienfeld for work done in Leipzig: "Method and apparatus for controlling electric current." First filed in Canada on 22.10.1925. *[The patent describes a field-effect transistor. Today, almost all transistors are field-effect transistors.]*

[LIL2]
US Patent 1900018 by Austrian physicist Julius Edgar Lilienfeld: "Device for controlling electric current." Filed on 28.03.1928. *[The patent describes a thin film field-effect transistor.]*

[LL7]
A. Bonner (2007). The art and logic of Ramon Llull. Brill Academic Pub, p. 290, 2007.

[MC43]
W. S. McCulloch, W. Pitts. A Logical Calculus of Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity.
Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, Vol. 5, p. 115-133, 1943.

[MIR] J. Schmidhuber (AI Blog, 2019). Deep Learning: Our Miraculous Year 1990-1991. Preprint
arXiv:2005.05744, 2020.

[NASC1] J. Schmidhuber. First Pow(d)ered flight / plane truth. Correspondence, *Nature, 421 p 689, Feb 2003.*

[NASC2]
J. Schmidhuber. Zooming in on aviation history.
Correspondence, *Nature, vol 566, p 39, 7 Feb 2019*.

[NASC3] J. Schmidhuber. The last inventor of the telephone. Letter, *Science, 319, no. 5871, p. 1759, March 2008.*

[NASC4] J. Schmidhuber. Turing: Keep his work in perspective.
Correspondence, *Nature, vol 483, p 541, March 2012*, doi:10.1038/483541b.

[NASC5] J. Schmidhuber. Turing in Context.
Letter, *Science, vol 336, p 1639, June 2012*.
(On Gödel, Zuse, Turing.)
See also comment on response by A. Hodges (DOI:10.1126/science.336.6089.1639-a)

[NASC6] J. Schmidhuber. Colossus was the first electronic digital computer. Correspondence, *Nature, 441 p 25, May 2006.*

[NASC6a] J. Schmidhuber. Comment on "Biography: The ABC of computing" by J. Gilbey, Nature 468 p 760-761 (2010). Link.

[NASC7] J. Schmidhuber. Turing's war work counts for more than computers. Link. Correspondence, *Nature, 429 p 501, June 2004*

[NASC8] J. Schmidhuber. Prototype resilient, self-modeling robots. Correspondence, *Science, 316, no. 5825 p 688, May 2007.*

[NASC9] J. Schmidhuber. Comparing the legacies of Gauss, Pasteur, Darwin. Correspondence, *Nature, vol 452, p 530, April 2008.*

[NEU45] J. von Neumann (1945). First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC.

[NS56]
A. Newell and H. Simon.
The logic theory machine—A complex information processing system.
IRE Transactions on Information Theory 2.3 (1956):61-79.

[POS]
E. L. Post (1936). Finite Combinatory Processes - Formulation 1. Journal of Symbolic Logic. 1: 103-105.
Link.

[RAU1]
M. Rausch. Heron von Alexandria. Die Automatentheater und die Erfindung der ersten antiken Programmierung. Diplomica Verlag GmbH, Hamburg 2012.
*[Perhaps the world's first programmable machine was an automatic theatre made in the 1st century by Heron of Alexandria, who apparently also had the first known working steam engine.]*

[RO98]
R. Rojas (1998). How to make Zuse's Z3 a universal computer. IEEE Annals of Computing, vol. 19:3, 1998.

[RU58]
B. Russell (1958). The Philosophy of Leibniz. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1958.

[SH51]
J. W. Shirley (1951). Binary Numeration before Leibniz. American Journal of Physics 19 (452-454).

[SHA37]
C. E. Shannon (1938). A Symbolic Analysis of Relay and Switching Circuits. Trans. AIEE. 57 (12): 713-723. Based on his thesis, MIT, 1937.

[SHA7a]
N. Sharkey (2007). A programmable robot from AD 60. New Scientist, Sept 2017.

[SHA7b]
N. Sharkey (2007). A 13th Century Programmable Robot. Univ. of Sheffield, 2007.
*[On a programmable drum machine of 1206 by Al-Jazari.]*

[SKO23] T. Skolem (1923). Begründung der elementaren Arithmetik
durch die rekurrierende Denkweise ohne Anwendung scheinbarer
Veränderlichen mit unendlichem Ausdehnungsbereich. *Skrifter utgit av
Videnskapsselskapet i Kristiania, I. Mathematisk-Naturvidenskabelig
Klasse 6 (1923), 38 pp.*

[SMO13]
L. Smolin (2013). My hero: Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz. The Guardian, 2013.
Link.
*[Quote: "And this is just the one part of Leibniz's enormous legacy: the philosopher Stanley Rosen called him "the smartest person who ever lived"."]*

[SV20] S. Vazire (2020). A toast to the error detectors. Let 2020 be the year in which we value those who ensure that science is self-correcting. Nature, vol 577, p 9, 2/2/2020.

[T19]
ACM's justification of the 2018 A.M. Turing Award (announced in 2019). WWW link.
Local copy 1 (HTML only).
Local copy 2 (HTML only).
[T22] debunks this justification.

[T22] J. Schmidhuber (AI Blog, 2022).
Scientific Integrity and the History of Deep Learning: The 2021 Turing Lecture, and the 2018 Turing Award. Technical Report IDSIA-77-21, IDSIA, Lugano, Switzerland, 2022.
*Debunking [T19].*

[TUR]
A. M. Turing. On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Series 2, 41:230-267. Received 28 May 1936. Errata appeared in Series 2, 43, pp 544-546 (1937). *[2nd explicit proof that the Entscheidungsproblem (decision problem) does not have a general solution.]*

[TUR1]
A. M. Turing. Intelligent Machinery. Unpublished Technical Report, 1948.
Link.
In: Ince DC, editor. Collected works of AM Turing - Mechanical Intelligence. Elsevier Science Publishers, 1992.

[TUR2]
A. M. Turing (1952). The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 237 (641): 37-72.

[TUR3]
G. Oppy, D. Dowe (2021).
The Turing Test.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
*Quote: "it is sometimes suggested that the Turing Test is prefigured in Descartes' Discourse on the Method. (Copeland (2000:527) finds an anticipation of the test in the 1668 writings of the Cartesian de Cordemoy. Abramson (2011a) presents archival evidence that Turing was aware of Descartes' language test at the time that he wrote his 1950 paper. Gunderson (1964) provides an early instance of those who find that Turing's work is foreshadowed in the work of Descartes.)"*

[TUR3a]
D. Abramson. Descartes' Influence on Turing. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42:544-551, 2011.

[TUR3b]
Are computers conscious?—Panpsychism with Noam Chomsky | Theories of Everything. *Mentioning the ancient "Turing Test" by Descartes.*
YouTube video, 2022.

[TUR21] J. Schmidhuber (AI Blog, Sep 2021). Turing Oversold. It's not Turing's fault, though.
*This was number 1 on Hacker News.*

[URQ10]
A. Urquhart. Von Neumann, Gödel and complexity theory. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16.4 (2010): 516-530.
Link.

[VAR13]
M. Y. Vardi (2013). Who begat computing? Communications of the ACM, Vol. 56(1):5, Jan 2013.
Link.

[W45]
G. H. Wannier (1945).
The Statistical Problem in Cooperative Phenomena.
Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 50.

[WA74]
H. Wang (1974). From Mathematics to Philosophy, New York: Humanities Press.

[WA96]
H. Wang (1996). A Logical Journey: From Gödel to Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[WI48]
N. Wiener (1948).
Time, communication, and the nervous system. Teleological mechanisms. Annals of the N.Y. Acad. Sci. 50 (4): 197-219.
*[Quote: "The history of the modern computing machine goes back to Leibniz and Pascal. Indeed, the general idea of a computing machine is nothing but a mechanization of Leibniz's calculus ratiocinator."]*

[Z36]
S. Faber (2000). Konrad Zuses Bemühungen um die Patentanmeldung der Z3.

[ZU36]
K. Zuse (1936).
Verfahren zur selbsttätigen Durchführung von Rechnungen mit Hilfe von Rechenmaschinen. Patent application Z 23 139 / GMD Nr. 005/021, 1936.
*[First patent application describing a general, practical, program-controlled computer.]*

[ZU37]
K. Zuse (1937). Einführung in die allgemeine Dyadik. *[Mentions the storage of program instructions in the computer's memory.]*

[ZU38]
K. Zuse (1938). Diary entry of 4 June 1938.
*[Description of computer architectures that put both program instructions and data into storage—compare the later "von Neumann" architecture.*^{[NEU45]}]

[ZU48]
K. Zuse (1948). Über den Plankalkül als Mittel zur Formulierung schematisch kombinativer Aufgaben.
Archiv der Mathematik 1(6), 441-449 (1948).
PDF.
*[Apparently the first practical design of an automatic theorem prover (based on Zuse's high-level programming language Plankalkül).]*

[ZUS21]
J. Schmidhuber (AI Blog, 2021). 80th anniversary celebrations: 1941: Konrad Zuse completes the first working general computer, based on his 1936 patent application.

[ZUS21a]
J. Schmidhuber (AI Blog, 2021). 80. Jahrestag: 1941: Konrad Zuse baut ersten funktionalen Allzweckrechner, basierend auf der Patentanmeldung von 1936.

[ZUS21b]
J. Schmidhuber (2021).
Der Mann, der den Computer
erfunden hat. (The man who invented the computer.)
Weltwoche, Nr. 33.21, 19 August 2021.
PDF.

.