- ... inputs1
- Recently I became aware that Don Mathis
had some related ideas (personal communication). A hierarchical
approach to
sequence generation was pursued by [8].
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... well2
- For instance, we might employ the
more limited feedforward networks and a `time window' approach. In this case,
the number of previous inputs to be considered as a basis for the next
prediction will remain fixed.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... step3
- A unique time representation is
theoretically necessary to provide with unambiguous
information about when the failure occurred (see also the last
paragraph of section 2). A unique representation of the time
that went by since the last unpredicted input occurred will do as well.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... description4
- In contrast,
the reduced
descriptions referred to by [10] are not unambiguous.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.